Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 6:52:27 GMT
No super electronic , quantum or whatever super brain can give such an answer. Because the answer depends on the type of reader . From his age. From your qualification. And therefore on his ability to understand the text. That's why Google collects as much information about us as it can. This is why he wants to know our habits, our interests, even our movements. Google wants to know who we are, what we read, on what topic we are authoritative (if we publish something on the web). Moving on to the more "social" side, this is why I believe that for Google the shares towards the various social networks (its "competitors") will also end up being important , if and when it can track them with more precision:
a like or a retweet is equivalent to a appreciation, which could have a greater value the Malaysia Phone Number List more authoritative the person who does it is. The same goes for the comments. And this is why links are still so "heavy" in Google's algorithm today: although they are highly fake, in that sector the engine has developed various tools and technologies over the years capable of understanding quite well when a link is of quality/authoritative and when it isn't. Conclusion I'm not saying that a search engine won't be able to "rationally" judge the goodness and quality of a written text: I actually believe that it has already been able to do so for some time (at least from a purely mathematical point of view).
hand there is a content, on the other hand there are tens, hundreds, thousands of people who are profoundly different from each other in terms of interests, culture and ability to understand. This is why Google cannot give univocal answers, and this is why the engine's SERPs are increasingly personalized (and less and less the same for everyone). I therefore believe that these super calculators are (and will be) used primarily to speed up things like the release/recalculation of certain algorithms (like Panda or Penguin), and to better track user behavior with respect to search page results.
a like or a retweet is equivalent to a appreciation, which could have a greater value the Malaysia Phone Number List more authoritative the person who does it is. The same goes for the comments. And this is why links are still so "heavy" in Google's algorithm today: although they are highly fake, in that sector the engine has developed various tools and technologies over the years capable of understanding quite well when a link is of quality/authoritative and when it isn't. Conclusion I'm not saying that a search engine won't be able to "rationally" judge the goodness and quality of a written text: I actually believe that it has already been able to do so for some time (at least from a purely mathematical point of view).
hand there is a content, on the other hand there are tens, hundreds, thousands of people who are profoundly different from each other in terms of interests, culture and ability to understand. This is why Google cannot give univocal answers, and this is why the engine's SERPs are increasingly personalized (and less and less the same for everyone). I therefore believe that these super calculators are (and will be) used primarily to speed up things like the release/recalculation of certain algorithms (like Panda or Penguin), and to better track user behavior with respect to search page results.